And hasn't it been reported that people whose lung cancer is found early by such scans have a five-year survival rate of 80 percent, as opposed to 15 percent for the typical lung-cancer patient whose condition is detected later? Why not get scanned today?
The answer may surprise most Americans: we just don't know if lung cancer screening does more good than harm. While the benefits of screening are unproven, the harms - one familiar, the other less so - are certain.
Personal weblog of Ted Pavlic. Includes lots of MATLAB and LaTeX (computer typesetting) tips along with commentary on all things engineering and some things not. An endless effort to keep it on the simplex.
Monday, August 22, 2005
CT Scans for Lung Cancer: Double-edged Sword
NYTimes: Opinion: Warned, but Worse Off
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment